PTSD Claims for Non-Vietnam Veterans

Written By: Jennifer Kahl 

Last week, the Department of Defense (DOD) agreed to reevaluate the less-than-honorable discharges of Vietnam veterans whose behavior may have been a symptom of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). PTSD was not identified as a mental illness until 1980, so the behavior that warranted these less-favorable discharges may have been symptoms of the untreated illness. The new guidelines set out by the DOD will give these veterans the opportunity to appeal their discharges, opening up new opportunities for education, disability and housing benefits, and veteran’s health care.

The decision by the DOD indicates that the Department is acknowledging, at least to a certain degree, the “Catch-22” in which victims of PTSD are often caught. Though PTSD is often a service-related disease that should qualify the individual for benefits, when misunderstood, its symptoms may disqualify the veteran by resulting in a less-than-honorable discharge. The veteran is then caught in a vicious cycle: he cannot qualify for benefits because of his PTSD, and he cannot get treatment for his PTSD because he has no benefits. However, this risk of being caught in this cycle is not limited to Vietnam veterans. Just because the diagnosis was recognized in 1980 does not mean that all veterans suffering from PTSD after that date were correctly diagnosed. Even today, service men and women who are facing discipline for misconduct and behavioral problems are only given a medical evaluation if they claim PTSD as a mitigating factor. If they are discharged for bad conduct and are later diagnosed, they will find themselves caught in the same trap as their Vietnam comrades.

Though last week’s decision does not address the full scope of the problem, it will hopefully initiate progress for all affected veterans.



Philipps, Dave. New Rules May Allow Benefits Long Denied to Vietnam-Era Veterans. The New York Times, Sept 3, 2014. <>.


Tilghman, Andrew. DoD Willing to Reconsider Discharges of Vietnam Vets With PTSD. Military Times, September 3, 2014. < NEWS05/309030039/DoD-willing-reconsider-discharges-Vietnam-vets-PTSD>.


Zoroya, Gregg. Forced-Out Vets Get Chance to Argue PTSD Claims. USA Today, September 3, 2014. <>.


Published in: on September 15, 2014 at 11:38 AM Comments (0)

Knowing the Unknowable: Understanding the Effects of Combat Through Film

By: Michael Althouse

For those of us who have not served in the military, it may be difficult to fully understand the experiences of combat.  There are extremely few circumstances in civilian life that mirror a solider in a combat zone.  When a civilian like myself is working with combat veterans, it is therefore useful to try to increase our understanding of the combat experience.  While it will be impossible to entirely comprehend what the veteran has gone through, a deeper understanding can help us better relate to the veteran’s struggles, their activities post-deployment, and possibly more easily recognize actions as symptomatic of PTSD and other combat-related disabilities.    One simple tool to gain this deeper understanding is to view films that accurately portray the combat experience.  The following is a short list of recommended viewing, with notes explaining their selection.


            This documentary follows a group of soldiers during 2007 in the Korangal Valley of Afghanistan.  The film intersperses the footage from Afghanistan with post-deployment interviews of the soldiers involved.  This technique allows the viewer to both see the events a soldier experienced in combat while simultaneously learning how that experience effected them physically and emotionally.  The film does not hold back any punches: some of the soldiers in the film die.  For those of us who have no reference point for military combat in our lives, the experience of watching this film can be and incredibly jarring introduction to the realities of combat life.

Now, After[1]

            Now, After is a short film made by SSG Kyle Hausmann-Stokes after he returned from Iraq.  The story is told from a returning soldier’s point of view, and graphically depicts how the effects of combat can interfere with daily civilian life.  This film is particularly useful for those seeking to better understand the often times confusing actions from sufferers of PTSD.  It may be surprising to see how routine moments in daily life can trigger flashbacks to a veteran’s time in service.


60 Minutes Presents: Honoring Our Troops[2]

            On May 24, 2012, the news program 60 Minutes dedicated an entire episode to stories from veterans of Afghanistan and Iraq.  The film contains some on-the-ground footage, but it is mostly told through interviews of the veterans recounting their experiences in combat and returning home.  The second segment of the episode in particular recounts the difficulties many combat veterans face returning to civilian life and coping with disabilities.


These films are a useful starting point for anyone wishing to better understand the experience of combat veterans.  While it will not give the viewer a complete understanding of the experience, the films will impart a sense of what combat veterans have faced, and how it has affected their lives.


[1] Viewable at

[2] Viewable at

Published in: on November 7, 2013 at 12:56 PM Comments (0)

Book Review: The Good Soldiers

Written by Paul Silver

In 2008 2-16 Infantry, part of the 1st Infantry Division stationed out of Fort Riley, Kansas deployed to Baghdad Iraq. For many of the Soldiers in the Battalion it was not their first trip to a combat zone. In fact, Finkle was with the unit and wrote the book The Good Soldiers about the combat operations undertaken by the men of 2-16. Thank You For Your Service, however, picks up with the after-war. It begins with Staff Sergeant Adam Schumman, who is waiting for a helicopter in Baghdad Iraq. Schumman is wounded. His evacuation from theater is deemed urgent. However, Schumman hasn’t been shot, no IED has detonated under his truck. By all accounts he is in good physical health. However, Schumman has given up on living. The stress of over 1,000 days of combat have finally caught up with him and now the Army has made the decision to send him home. Over the next 1,000 days Schumman and his wife Sascha will fight a new series of battles to finally bring Adam home.

From there Finkle takes the reader on an emotional tour de force examining the lives of Soldiers, widows and family members all of whom, like Schumman, are engaged in the battle that follows a return from combat. Through their struggles he paints the narrative of the approximately 500,000 veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan who have returned with either PTSD or TBI, the “hallmark wounds” of the War on Terrorism. Finkle gets inside of the Soldier’s marriages and mental health treatment. He documents their nightmares and insecurities. He juxtaposes all of these with the five words most often uttered by civilians who don’t know how to engage with veterans, “thank you for your service.” What follows then is a portrait of veterans issues more broadly as told by the veterans themselves. Finkle’s book gives urgency to Veteran’s issues and underscores the damage of combat. He does it not just through Schumman’s PTSD, but through other men in his unit and through their families. It is the story of the civil-military divide and the war that in many cases has already been forgotten and uneasily brushed aside with a brusque sentence, “thank you for your service.”

As a veteran myself, I read this book and was mesmerized by it, I found the author to truly understand the plight of returning Soldiers. He captured their grief and their alienation and makes it real for the reader. As a student in the Lewis B. Puller Jr. Clinic, I feel that this book needs to be read by incoming students. It is the sort of material that makes the issues students are about to engage with real. The emotionally wrenching anecdotes give clarity and focus the talking about issues such as PTSD, TBI and survivor’s guilt. The book does not shy away from the issues at any point. It shows the turmoil of Schumman’s perceived failure and weakness on his relationship with his family; an issue that is certainly germane to clinic intake interviews. Furthermore, the book does a fantastic job at underscoring that though a veteran’s wounds may not be visible, it does not mean that they do not exist and that they are not debilitating.


Published in: on at 12:55 PM Comments (0)

Despite Dire Predictions, VA Claims Backlog Decreased Slightly During Shutdown

By: Allie Klein


In response to increasing public and congressional scrutiny, the VA spent this year addressing the hundreds of thousands of claims that have languished, undecided, for more than 125 days. As the federal government shutdown began, VA officials warned that it would have a catastrophic impact on claims processing. On October 1, 2013, VA Assistant Secretary of Public Affairs Tommy Sowers predicted that the VA’s massive backlog of disability compensation claims would grow as a result of the shutdown. VA Secretary Eric Shinseki echoed this pessimistic assessment in his October 9 testimony before the House Veterans Affairs Committee. He insisted that shutdown-related furloughing threatened to derail six months of progress against the claims backlog, and could potentially prevent the VA from achieving its goal of eliminating the backlog entirely by the end of 2015.


Now that the shutdown has ended, however, the VA’s claims processing statistics suggest that these fears were misplaced. Though the rate at which the VA processed claims slowed, the total number of backlogged claims continued to fall during the two-week shutdown. The 10,000 claim drop from 421,793 on September 28 to 411,704 on October 19 included 900 claims processed during the shutdown.


Reactions to these statistics in Washington split along party lines. Ranking committee member Rep. Mike Michaud, D-Maine, released a statement lauding the VA’s performance: “While the impact of the shutdown on the backlog doesn’t appear to be as severe as some had feared, at the very least, it’s comforting to know that the current strategy in place is enough to continue reductions, even without overtime.” In contrast, committee member Rep. Doug Lamborn, R-Colorado, seized on the incongruence between the predictions and reality. “This drop is stunning in light of the administration’s threats the backlog would increase as a result of a government shutdown,” said Lamborn.


Committee Chairman Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Florida, pointed his criticisms at the VA’s failure to meet its own internal goal for fiscal year 2013 of reducing the claims backlog by completing 1.27 million claims by September 30. The VA’s end-of-year records show that it fell 100,000 claims short of this benchmark, despite receiving 272,000 less new claims this year than originally forecast. “Instead of debating whether or not VA’s dire predictions regarding the shutdown’s impact came to fruition, I remain focused on a much more important question: Why is the department still falling short of its own backlog goals?” said Miller.


As part of the continuing resolution Congress passed to end the shutdown, the VA will receive an additional $300 million to aid its efforts to tackle the backlog. Only time will tell whether the additional influx of cash will be money well spent.

Published in: on at 12:53 PM Comments (0)